[CLUE-Talk] Iraq Stuph

[David Willson]

You've entirely ignored Kevin's point, which remains valid, whichever
word you use, 'mercenary' or 'terrorist'.  Isn't it petty to natter away
at one mis-applied word, and ignore the valid core argument?

On Tue, 2003-04-22 at 18:18, Joe 'Zonker' Brockmeier wrote:
> Kevin,
> 
> > > Perhaps--and it may depend what you mean by "right." It appears to mean,
> > > does it not, that Iraq was really not much of a military threat after
> > > all? Where was the imminent danger that our leaders made so much of in
> > 
> > In military terms, there are mercenaries and there are armies, which has
> > the greater threat?  Depends in where and when it is used.  Look what 19
> > mercenaries did on 9/11!  The threat is real no matter where or the
> > numbers that are threatening us.  A person with a 22 is still as scarey
> > as one with a .45 cal.
> 
> Mercenaries get paid, Kevin. They do it for the *money* -- the idiots on
> 9/11 were terrorists. Thought you would have picked up on that
> distinction by now. 
> 
> Zonker
> -- 
> Joe 'Zonker' Brockmeier
> jzb at dissociatedpress.net
> Aim: zonkerjoe
> http://www.dissociatedpress.net
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CLUE-Talk mailing list
> CLUE-Talk at clue.denver.co.us
> http://clue.denver.co.us/mailman/listinfo/clue-talk