[CLUE-Talk] Another Bush Lie v2.0

Jeff Cann j.cann at isuma.org
Fri Oct 31 14:51:02 MST 2003


On Friday 31 October 2003 9:31 am, Randy Arabie wrote:

<snip>

I agree with your points and I said in response to Jed that I don't think this 
is a partisian issue - both parties are biased; otherwise there'd be no 
differences between them.

> There's no such thing as a source of the "unvarnished
> truth".   Anything that requires interpretation by a human
> is varnished.  There is no such thing as an unbiased human.

And given this, you just proved my point - which is why I find it assine that 
our President thinks that:  "And the most objective sources I have are people 
on my staff who tell me what's happening in the world."

I'm disagreeing with the 'most objective sources' part.  Simply not true, you 
said so yourself with the 'no such thing as an unbiased human'.

This is fundamentally too simplistic a view point.  If you're the leader of 
the free world, as the US President is often called, doesn't it make sense to 
get as much info as possible, perhaps from other sources than your own 
cabinet. 

Happy Halloween.
Jeff

> ---
> Allons Rouler!
>
> Randy
> http://www.arabie.org/
> _______________________________________________
> CLUE-Talk mailing list
> Post messages to: CLUE-Talk at clue.denver.co.us
> Unsubscribe or manage your options:
> http://clue.denver.co.us/mailman/listinfo/clue-talk

-- 
http://isuma.org/



More information about the clue-talk mailing list