[clue-talk] the IPv6 dream is dead - more discussion fodder

[Nate Duehr]

dennisjperkins at comcast.net wrote:
> Appliances was a stupid reason but we might want it for another reason.  Cell phones with Internet capability.

Uhh, we already have that.  Though NAT.

It's actually a benefit.  The poor little dears with their tiny CPU's 
can't be DDoS'ed off the Net, en masse, by a guy with a single cable modem.

:-)

Nate