[clue-talk] Ron Paul 2008

[Nate Duehr]

dennisjperkins at comcast.net wrote:
> If they wanted to be able to pass a bill that Bush opposed, remember how much is required to override his veto.  
> 
> Does it make sense to fight to pass a bill if he can veto it, and you cannot override him?  Do you want to waste your time tilting at windmills?

Exactly as the founders envisioned.  If a true majority can't be 
reached... it doesn't become law.

Bring on line-item veto power, too.  No more "riders" and "pork" hanging 
on important bills.  One vote, one issue... and then "We the people" can 
adequately judge our representative's voting practices.

Nate