<html><head><style type='text/css'>p { margin: 0; }</style></head><body><div style='font-family: Arial; font-size: 12pt; color: #000000'>They've done both 32 and 64-bit since at least 2007. <br><br>I didn't Plan 9 was still alive.<br><br>----- Original Message -----<br>From: "Bruce Ediger" <bediger@inlumineconsulting.com><br>To: "CLUE talk" <clue-talk@cluedenver.org><br>Sent: Monday, June 15, 2009 1:26:28 PM GMT -07:00 US/Canada Mountain<br>Subject: Re: [clue-talk] survey results<br><br>On Mon, 15 Jun 2009, dennisjperkins@comcast.net wrote:<br><br>> I do have Ubuntu on one computer but I will probably replace it with Arch<br>> Linux. Arch requires more initial work than many other distros, and adding<br>> some packages might require just a bit more work because Arch uses a<br>> ports-like system for a lot of packages.<br><br>Didn't Arch just go all x86_64 (64-bit)? I was just about to install Arch<br>on a Pentium box, when I read that somewhere. I'm not against 64-bit machines<br>or OSes, I just don't have an Opteron lying around.<br><br>I'm thinking of trying "Plan 9" again soon. Anybody tried it in a while?<br>_______________________________________________<br>clue-talk mailing list<br>clue-talk@cluedenver.org<br>http://www.cluedenver.org/mailman/listinfo/clue-talk<br></div></body></html>