<p>How about running debian stable with the parts od testing and unstable that you want.</p>
<p>Also, sidux is pretty stable when properly maintained with a program called smxi.</p>
<p><blockquote type="cite">On Jan 9, 2010 10:51 PM, "Michael Irons" <<a href="mailto:michael.irons@gmail.com">michael.irons@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br><br>Thanks Dennis and Louis.<div><br></div><div>Arch looks nice... I will look more into it. It seems to be the most promising.</div>
<div>Unfortunately Louis, my schedule doesn't coincide with CLUE's so I cannot make the meetings. I have been researching a lot on the internet though. </div>
<div><br></div><div>I have come to the realization that I want two different things that are not easily reconciled:</div><div><br></div><div>Security, stability, standards (Debian)</div><div>Newer software (Arch, Ubuntu, Sidux, etc).</div>
<div><br></div><div>I think that the easiest solution would be to build a time machine and bring back a stable Debian from the future. Although, I don't know if apt would support the correct protocols to get the right updates from the future. Anyway, until I succeed in the time machine, I will keep looking. </div>
<div><br></div><div>Thanks,</div><div><br></div><div>Mike Irons</div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
clue-talk mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:clue-talk@cluedenver.org">clue-talk@cluedenver.org</a><br>
<a href="http://www.cluedenver.org/mailman/listinfo/clue-talk" target="_blank">http://www.cluedenver.org/mailman/listinfo/clue-talk</a><br></blockquote></p>