[clue-tech] Help with 2 hard drives on same IDE
Angelo Bertolli
angelo at freeshell.org
Mon Sep 19 13:24:24 MDT 2005
Jeff Schroeder wrote:
>A general rule is to split drives amongst as many IDE interfaces as
>possible-- not really for the reason you're describing here, but for
>performance reasons. You'll get better throughput if you're not
>sending twice the data (i.e., two drives) down one cable. Plus, if the
>IDE interface on the motherboard dies for some reason, you won't
>(potentially) hork two drives.
>
>Along those lines, if you happen to have IDE cards (e.g., Promise) so
>you can support half a dozen drives, you'd want to split the drives
>across the cables as much as possible.
>
>
Thanks for the tips. Actually I'm just using the MB IDE controllers,
and I have 2 burners and 2 HD, so I figured if I were going to do HD ->
burner much, that's probably more critical. (Esp since one of the
drives is only for backup--ironic huh?)
Anyway, my current plan is to:
1) Run diagnostic, if that says ok then run FIXMBR and FIXBOOT from
Windows and call it fixed.
2) If it says there is damage, then get a replacement from Western Digital
But now, I'm really paranoid about this. This is only the second time
in almost 10 years that I've tried to do this, and both times I had a
problem with one of the hard drives. Last time, I thought it was
because I was mixing an 80-wire drive with a 40-wire drive, so I thought
this should be no problem.
Angelo
_______________________________________________
CLUE-tech mailing list
CLUE-tech at cluedenver.org
http://cluedenver.org/mailman/listinfo/clue-tech
More information about the clue-tech
mailing list