[clue-tech] RAID-0 & LVM

[mike havlicek]

You are a liar. That does not work.

--- "David L. Anselmi" <anselmi at anselmi.us> wrote:

> You might get better responses if you didn't switch
> subjects in the 
> middle of a thread.  And if you trimmed your posts. 
> That's just me and 
> I apologize for being cranky (Collins would say
> curmudgeonly) enough to 
> say anything.
> 
> > --- mike havlicek <mhavlicek1 at yahoo.com> wrote:
> > 
> >> RAID-0 and LVM
> >> 
> >> Does one or the other compromise the advantages
> of
> >> either?
> 
> No.  But I'd guess both is more overhead than
> either.  You should test 
> it and see.
> 
> >> I am rebuilding a box that went haywire.
> [...]
> >> The funny thing was that it seems to be
> filesystem curruption or
> >> more likely a particular file that I haven't
> tracked down, that 
> >> started causing problems rather than disk
> failure... ie the
> >> problems were mirrored.
> 
> I've never seen haywire require rebuilding (where
> haywire != hareware 
> failure).
> 
> [...]
> > Jumping back a step ... since /boot cannot live on
> an
> > LVM partition -> That makes the drivespace
> unequal...hmm
> 
> It can.  Been there, done that, doing it now. 
> (Well, I don't ever make 
> a /boot partition so it's really / that is on the
> LVM.  Same difference. 
>   And / on LVM on RAID-1 works too.)
> 
> Dave
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CLUE-tech mailing list
> CLUE-tech at cluedenver.org
> http://cluedenver.org/mailman/listinfo/clue-tech
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
_______________________________________________
CLUE-tech mailing list
CLUE-tech at cluedenver.org
http://cluedenver.org/mailman/listinfo/clue-tech