[clue-tech] Switching to Qwest DSL soon, any suggestions?
William
wwcluetech1 at kimballstuff.com
Sun Jun 17 01:32:03 MDT 2007
Adrian Noland wrote:
> On 6/14/07, *Ken MacFerrin* <lists at macferrin.com
> <mailto:lists at macferrin.com>> wrote:
>
> [snip]
> >
> > I have used and will continue to support Front Range Internet.
> > (www.frii.net <http://www.frii.net>) Local techs with a clue,
> and never seen a bottleneck
> > ever on my DSL service with multiple static IP's. If you're
> comparing
> > their non-static-IP service to Qwest's offerings without MSN,
> they're
> > probably $10/month more. And well worth it.
> >
> > And you get to go to bed at night knowing you're supporting
> local techs
> > with real jobs, not McJobs where someone reads you a script from
> their
> > screen at some outsourced Qwest call center.
> >
>
>
> Add another vote for FRII (www.frii.com <http://www.frii.com>). I
> switched from Comcast to
> Qwest/FRII when I moved last year and have been very satisfied. My
> setup is Qwest Connect Platinum (naked DSL) plus FRII Home DSL Deluxe
> and a couple extra bucks for a static IP. I also prefer to run the
> Actiontec modem in transparent bridge mode so that it only handles the
> DSL connection setup and allows my firewall to "own" the external IP
> address.
>
>
> And another vote for FRII. For all the reasons stated above. They know
> their stuff, and they don't bother you with scripts and such nonsense.
Yet another FRII support vote (6 years and 4 locations) with a naked
Qwest DSL line, FRII as ISP, with a static IPA subnet, at low cost, with
great support (highly responsive and intelligent). One call directly to
FRII gets everything you need -- they even handled dealing with Qwest
for me.
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
More information about the clue-tech
mailing list