<html>
<head>
</head>
<body>
Well I actually agree with you. I use Netscape Mail (6.2.2) and the spell
checker insists on checking the entire document so I can't check my own spelling
without having to wait and respond to the spell checker check someone else's
writing, including their name which the spell checker often doesn't recognize
as a word. I don't understand why people can't just live and let live. If
they like to post on the bottom, then post on the bottom. If I like to post
on the top then please let me post on the top. People are different and
have different reasons for doing what they do. Personally I prefer the response
on top because that's what's new. I don't like to scroll through past problems
I already know about. If I've forgotten the subject then I consider it my
on duty to read what's on the bottom.<br>
<br>
Adam Bultman wrote:<br>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite" cite="mid:Pine.LNX.4.33.0205231242290.28856-100000@bobdobb.glaven.org">
<pre wrap="">Hmm... I I disagree. If someone is just replying to it as a whole, like I<br>am now, I *hate* scrolling all the way to the bottom. It's annoying. In<br>the case where someone replies to each aspect of an email, I prefer the<br><br></pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">post<br><br></pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->reply<br><br>style. If someone sends their post and I have to scroll to the bottom,<br>it's about 75 percent less likely it will get read. I use pine, and while<br>I can hit page down, it's all the wayon the right side of my keybaord, and<br>is a pain to hit to scroll down. Top-replies allow me to read something,<br>and if I don't understand it, I can just scroll down and read. I<br>shouldn't have to read the same post over and over again (or have to<br>scroll past it on every email) so I can read someone's quip at the end.<br></pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>