[clue] clue Digest, Vol 66, Issue 5

[Mike]

> Message: 1
> Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 13:28:48 +0000 (UTC)
> From: dennisjperkins at comcast.net
> Subject: [clue] GnuPG
> To: clue at cluedenver.org
> Message-ID:
>         <1676478566.41767609.1469107728092.JavaMail.zimbra at comcast.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Is anyone using gpg? Dave Anselmi held a keysigning party years ago, but
> how many have used it since then?
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 07:33:09 -0600
> From: Grant Johnson <grant at amadensor.com>
> Subject: Re: [clue] GnuPG
> To: CLUE's mailing list
>         <clue at cluedenver.org>,dennisjperkins at comcast.net
> Message-ID: <91BC9845-5817-4B74-A041-7B01AF006C16 at amadensor.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA512
>
> Of course I use it!
>
> On July 21, 2016 7:28:48 AM MDT, dennisjperkins at comcast.net wrote:
> >Is anyone using gpg? Dave Anselmi held a keysigning party years ago,
> >but how many have used it since then?
> >
> >
> >------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>
Oh, the irony of you asking this question, I was just starting to fret
about restoring my gpg keys (I was able to, finally); and I had just
thought that I need to get my keys signed. I was thinking of it as being an
issue I would raise at work, to see if anyone wanted to do a virtual/remote
key signing party or something; but as with technology, gpg is barely still
there puttering it out.

I'd be down for a keysigning party though.


-- 
Mike
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://cluedenver.org/pipermail/clue/attachments/20160721/a7100824/attachment.html