So, um did Google submit this OpenSSL patch back up stream? I believe OpenSSL uses a BSD license.<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 10:40 PM, David L. Anselmi <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:anselmi@anselmi.us">anselmi@anselmi.us</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;"><div class="im">Yaverot wrote:<br>
> Since his argument is mostly economic (taxing servers), I need to point out the counter argument:<br>
> <a href="http://techie-buzz.com/tech-news/google-switch-ssl-cost.html" target="_blank">http://techie-buzz.com/tech-news/google-switch-ssl-cost.html</a><br>
<br>
</div>"OpenSSL tends to allocate about 50KB of memory for each connection. We have patched OpenSSL to<br>
reduce this to about 5KB."<br>
<br>
"SSL has been optimized at its best at Google."<br>
<br>
"These facts prove that SSL is not as resource intensive as it is blamed to be."<br>
<br>
I'm sold! Sign us up!<br>
<div><div></div><div class="h5"><br>
Dave<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
clue mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:clue@cluedenver.org">clue@cluedenver.org</a><br>
<a href="http://cluedenver.org/mailman/listinfo/clue" target="_blank">http://cluedenver.org/mailman/listinfo/clue</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>