And it's a great discussion for another thread.<br>
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 3:24 PM, Dan Kulinski <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:daniel@kulinski.net">daniel@kulinski.net</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
Brings up a good technical discussion on what is possible with unreliable conditions. The filesystem isn't so bad, plenty ways to handle data that isn't frequently updated. The database presents a large problem though. I suspect some sort of replication that had a quorum feature would be required. This way all servers involved would be able to query the quorum as to the validity of their data.<br>
<font color="#888888">
<br>Dan<br>
</font><br>_______________________________________________<br>
clue mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:clue@cluedenver.org">clue@cluedenver.org</a><br>
<a href="http://cluedenver.org/mailman/listinfo/clue" target="_blank">http://cluedenver.org/mailman/listinfo/clue</a><br></blockquote></div><br>