<html><head></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; ">A lot of CLUE people have worked on Drupal 7 to get it to where it is.<div><br></div><div>If you set up a an alternative test website with similar features using something like WordPress then it would be really awesome to test it. Be sure to indicate what kind of server it is running on.</div><div>99guspuppet<br><div><br><div><div></div><blockquote type="cite"><div>On Jun 7, 2011, at 11:42 AM, Raymond DeRoo wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; ">Folks--<div><br><div><blockquote type="cite">I'll be on to monitor.</blockquote><div><br></div>I just started to poke around a bit and found the site to be *very* slow. Since we are technical folks and "very" is a near meaningless form of measurement, this is what I have found. Average page lot time seemed to be about five seconds, unless the link went to an external site or 404'd ( <a href="http://www-dev.cluedenver.org/">http://www-dev.cluedenver.org</a> is very responsive ). To further quantify what I witnessed I went to a few speed testing sites and have summarized their finding below. I hate to call the 4.4 second response time a fluke... but it really seems to be. Personally I feel any page with over a two second response time is too slow. Perhaps drupal is not the right choice for CLUE, has any looked into Wordpress, Typo3, etc?</div></div></div></blockquote><div style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><div><div><br></div></div></div></div></div></div></body></html>