I think Raymond's point was more along the lines of, do we have the time to invest and the necessary skills involved to make this a workable solution. I don't think he was criticizing the effort at all but rather trying to spur conversation on the worth of the features a full CMS brings to the organization. <br>
<br>So, what are the features Drupal brings and what are the value of those features? I am not asking you to defend the choice of Drupal, but I am genuinely interested in the logic that spurred the change and what benefits members will experience.<br>
<br>Thanks,<br> Dan Kulinski<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 11:56 AM, YES NOPE9 <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:yes@nope9.com">yes@nope9.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<br>
This effort is not taxing CLUE members one thin dime. It is not draining the treasury. The people working on it are doing so because they want to. The old website performs so much more poorly than the Drupal test site.... it is laughable, The current site has no forums, no books , no calendar, ........... I am not interested in giving those features up. Raymond.... instead of sniping at the effort going on .... why don't you come up with a superior ( and working ) alternative ? I would be excited to test it. If you want to stick with the current , static site...... you got your wish ..... for now............. the static site keeps chugging ( boringly ) along.<br>
99guspuppet<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
clue mailing list: <a href="mailto:clue@cluedenver.org">clue@cluedenver.org</a><br>
For information, account preferences, or to unsubscribe see:<br>
<a href="http://cluedenver.org/mailman/listinfo/clue" target="_blank">http://cluedenver.org/mailman/listinfo/clue</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br>