See also
http://slashdot.org/articles/02/06/04/228240.shtml?tid=109
http://zdnet.com.com/2100-1104-929669.html
http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/4/25569.html
charlie oriez wrote:
>Wired didnt pull any punches on this one:
>
>http://www.wired.com/news/linux/0,1411,52973,00.html
>
>
>
>