See also http://slashdot.org/articles/02/06/04/228240.shtml?tid=109 http://zdnet.com.com/2100-1104-929669.html http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/4/25569.html charlie oriez wrote: >Wired didnt pull any punches on this one: > >http://www.wired.com/news/linux/0,1411,52973,00.html > > > >