[CLUE-Talk] Iraq Stuph

[Kevin Cullis]

Joe,

On Tue, 2003-04-22 at 18:18, Joe 'Zonker' Brockmeier wrote:
> Kevin,
> 
> > > Perhaps--and it may depend what you mean by "right." It appears to mean,
> > > does it not, that Iraq was really not much of a military threat after
> > > all? Where was the imminent danger that our leaders made so much of in
> > 
> > In military terms, there are mercenaries and there are armies, which has
> > the greater threat?  Depends in where and when it is used.  Look what 19
> > mercenaries did on 9/11!  The threat is real no matter where or the
> > numbers that are threatening us.  A person with a 22 is still as scarey
> > as one with a .45 cal.
> 
> Mercenaries get paid, Kevin. They do it for the *money* -- the idiots on
> 9/11 were terrorists. Thought you would have picked up on that
> distinction by now. 

To say that Mercs are exclusively after the money is shallow thinking. 
Besides, the 9/11 terrorists didn't do if for the money, they did it for
the 76 virgins, or didn't you pick up on that distinction by now ;-)

Kevin

-- 
Kevin Cullis <kevincu at orci.com>