[CLUE-Talk] telemarketing list

Dennis J Perkins djperkins at americanisp.net
Fri Sep 26 06:06:41 MDT 2003


> On Thursday 25 September 2003 07:08 pm, Charles Oriez wrote:
> > A local Denver judge is the one responsible for the restraining order
> > stalling implementation of the telemarketer do not call list, after the
> > Congress acted in record time to enact legislation overturning the basis
> > for the Oklahoma judge's ruling.
> >
> > Nottingham Edward
> > 1929 Stout Dnv CO 80294  (303) 844-5018
> 
> Folks, before getting all upset about it, realize that the judge saw 
> preferential treatement of non-profit vs profit, which is discriminatory.
> The list will be back but with all businesses being barred.
> This is not a bad thing .
> 
> I have been called by organizations that infuriate me.
> Many of these none-prof are basically fronts for rip-offs.
> Some of them will get 80 % of the money to charity.
> Others are notorious for giving ~1% to their charity (Fraternity of Police 
> being the worst; it is a pure front for a bunch of cops).
> 
> Of course, if we can now stop the politicians from harassing us.
> I don't know about you but last election, I was getting calls every day for 
> about voting republican (mostly allard) saying that Bush needed support.
> arrrrggggghhhhhh.
>  I wanted to reach out and f***ing touch somebody.
> 
> So please, do not be bothering the judge.
> He did the right thing.
> 
> -- 
> cheers
> g.r.r.
> 

Discrimination?  Don't you have to sign up to get on the list?  In which case, 
the choice is yours, not some idiotic judge's.  If it turns out that enough 
people are annoyed by calls by non-profits, the law could be expanded to 
include them.





More information about the clue-talk mailing list