[clue-talk] Microsoft vs. the EU

[dennisjperkins at comcast.net]

No, it wasn't censored. 

Only some states were involved with the Federal government in the lawsuit. Some of them objected to the decision. If I recall correctly, two of them did not accept the remedy and pressed on alone. 

Microsoft is still being overseen by Judge Cottar-Kelly to make sure it complies with the court. That period was supposed to have ended, but the judge extended it. 

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Louis Miller" <veganguy1 at gmail.com> 
To: "CLUE talk" <clue-talk at cluedenver.org> 
Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 7:49:53 AM GMT -07:00 US/Canada Mountain 
Subject: Re: [clue-talk] Microsoft vs. the EU 

Dear Nate, 

Thanks for noticiing my post. I would imagine that most Americans didn't get this news story about the EU trial. I think it was a censored news story, and didn't make the American papers, though it should of. In the U.S. anti-trust case, there were no financial penalties assessed and no fines per day for non-compliance. 13 states disagreed with the final verdict. I would imagine other states disagreed, but just didn't feel like speaking up. 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Microsoft 

Louis 

_______________________________________________ clue-talk mailing list clue-talk at cluedenver.org http://www.cluedenver.org/mailman/listinfo/clue-talk 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://cluedenver.org/pipermail/clue-talk/attachments/20091110/4071ea46/attachment.html