[CLUE-Tech] rpm incremental upgrade?

[Young, Ed]

Thanx for the reply, but I don't realy see an answer to my question here. 

Please see below. 

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Tim Russell [SMTP:tim.russell at ilg.com]
> Sent:	Tuesday, February 13, 2001 12:40 PM
> To:	clue-tech at clue.denver.co.us
> Subject:	RE: [CLUE-Tech] rpm incremental upgrade?
> 
> I ran into some of this too.  Apparently Red Hat upgraded RPM enough to
> make
> a "line in the sand" between 6.2 and 7.0, so that anything that was
> created
> on a RH 7.0 system won't play on a 6.2 system.
> 
	So far I'm with you. I'm running RH 6.1 by the way....

> Now that the fixes are out for 7.0, I decided it might be stable enough to
> upgrade - it's been working nicely so far.  The 2.4 kernel upgrade on 7.0
> wasn't all that bad either, so I'd have to suggest that you move to 7.0
> and
> apply all the relevant errata RPM upgrades to make it reasonably stable.
> 
	What "relevant errata RPM upgrades"? I tried upgrading from 3.0.3 to
3.0.6 and it failed. Is there a finer grained upgrade path, and if so, what
is it? 

	Am I missing something here? 

> From a "prettiness" standpoint, I like 7.0 as well - it's now obvious to
> me
> what an absolute pig of a window manager Enlightenment was - you could
> make
> it pretty, but at a big cost!  Sawmill feels a lot more responsive,
> especially under VMWare.
> 
> Tim
> _______________________________________________
> CLUE-Tech mailing list
> CLUE-Tech at clue.denver.co.us
> http://clue.denver.co.us/mailman/listinfo/clue-tech