[CLUE-Tech] Anyone have a good slide scanner?

[Jed S. Baer]

I need to get some 35mm slides scanned, preferrably quickly. But the
"light lid" on my MicroTek scanner isn't bright enough to get good
results. If someone has a good scanner I could come over and use, I'd much
appreciate it.

Regards,
jed

-- 
  If R is the set of all sets which don't contain themselves,
  does R contain itself? 

Received: from green.its.bldrdoc.gov (green.its.bldrdoc.gov [132.163.64.205])
	by clue.denver.co.us (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA04840
	for <clue-tech at clue.denver.co.us>; Tue, 6 Nov 2001 16:05:48 -0700
Received: from gemini.its.bldrdoc.gov (wallen at gemini.its.bldrdoc.gov [132.163.64.73])
	by green.its.bldrdoc.gov (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id QAA12387
	for <clue-tech at clue.denver.co.us>; Tue, 6 Nov 2001 16:28:18 -0700 (MST)
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2001 16:31:26 -0700 (MST)
From: "J. Wayde Allen" <wallen at its.bldrdoc.gov>
To: clue-tech <clue-tech at clue.denver.co.us>
Subject: Re: [CLUE-Tech] Anyone have a good slide scanner?
In-Reply-To: <200111062319.fA6NJlq43745 at deimos.frii.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0111061629010.10583-100000 at gemini.its.bldrdoc.gov>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: clue-tech-admin at clue.denver.co.us
Errors-To: clue-tech-admin at clue.denver.co.us
X-BeenThere: clue-tech at clue.denver.co.us
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta2
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: clue-tech at clue.denver.co.us
List-Id: CLUE technical discussions, questions and answers. <clue-tech.clue.denver.co.us>

On Tue, 6 Nov 2001, Jed S. Baer wrote:

> I need to get some 35mm slides scanned, preferrably quickly. But the
> "light lid" on my MicroTek scanner isn't bright enough to get good
> results. If someone has a good scanner I could come over and use, I'd much
> appreciate it.

I don't have a scanner for 35 mm slides, but I think you'd have good luck
checking with some of the people in my other on-line community at
<http://rmp.opusis.com/>.  There are also serveral commercial options, but
this depends greatly on the intended use and the numerical value of
"some".

- Wayde
  (wallen at its.bldrdoc.gov)