[CLUE-Tech] A small request for the list.

[Joe Linux]

Be careful you could be banished from the kingdom for this top-up post. 
 Don't you know the holy grail is found at the bottom?

rjohnston at techangle.com wrote:

>Yea! A "Ni" War.
>
>long live monty python
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: clue-tech-admin at clue.denver.co.us
>[mailto:clue-tech-admin at clue.denver.co.us]On Behalf Of Jed S. Baer
>Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 12:52 PM
>To: clue-tech at clue.denver.co.us
>Subject: Re: [CLUE-Tech] A small request for the list.
>
>
>On Thu, 23 May 2002 12:39:32 -0600
>bof <bof at pcisys.net> wrote:
>
>>Jed S. Baer wrote:
>>
>>>Replying to Adams mention of inline replying; I think it works very
>>>well, and I'll not [sic] that inline replies are always below what's
>>>being replied to
>>>
>
>Aaack! The dreaded "[sic]". That's almost as bad as having someone say
>"NI!" to you.
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>CLUE-Tech mailing list
>CLUE-Tech at clue.denver.co.us
>http://clue.denver.co.us/mailman/listinfo/clue-tech
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://cluedenver.org/pipermail/clue-tech/attachments/20020523/91c01460/attachment.html