Replys with broken HTML see [Re: [CLUE-Tech] Re: "Hmm... I I disagree."]

[Collins]

On Fri, 24 May 2002 13:53:05 -0600 "Jed S. Baer" <thag at frii.com>
wrote:
> On Fri, 24 May 2002 10:58:07 -0600
> Tim Harris <tdharris at usa.com> wrote:
> 
> > Jed S. Baer wrote:
> > 
> > >"Tim Harris" <tdharris at usa.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >>Just a comment. I find it annoying to scroll through a post and
> > >see a>lot of non-functional html code. It's a pain. Does any else
> > >have an>opinion about this?
> > >



> My personal recommendation is Sylpheed. It's really a snap to set up
> and run. It strips HTML and shows you the plain text. It's fast.
> Hey, it'll even auto-sort your mail into various folders, if you
> like.
> 
> Since this is a discussion list, I don't see any harm in having the
> discussion ;-).
> 

Yep, almost everyone hates html, although if you use Sylpheed (is
there any other mailer?), it's mostly painless, since Sylpheed strips
that out as an attachment.  I get lots of email from my sister-in-law
using some M$ brain-dead mailer with several layers of forwards and
htmls, and it's a real challenge even to find the actual message
content.

The only thing that bugs me more
<rant>
is people who feel compelled to send all mail with PGP headers and
trailers that I have to wade through in every mail!!!  That sucks big
time!!!
</rant>

-- 
Collins Richey - Denver Area - WWTLRD?
gentoo(since 01/01/01) 2.4.18+(ext3) xfce-sylpheed-mozilla