[CLUE-Tech] October talk.

[Paul Bille]

-----Original Message-----
From: clue-tech-admin at clue.denver.co.us
[mailto:clue-tech-admin at clue.denver.co.us] On Behalf Of Jed S. Baer
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 2:47 PM
To: clue-tech at clue.denver.co.us
Subject: Re: [CLUE-Tech] October talk.


On Tue, 24 Sep 2002 14:03:00 -0600
David Anselmi <anselmi at americanisp.net> wrote:

> I've (finally) updated the web site for the October meeting.

Way to go, Dave! ;-)

> talking about TCP/IP, and maybe doing a follow-up talk in November.  I
> want to teach people how networking works so they don't feel like 
> networking problems are something mysterious.
> 
> At this point, I'm thinking I'll talk about how the various packets
> (TCP, IP, ethernet) are put together, what that means to you, and what

> commands are used to configure things.  A follow-up talk might cover 
> application level protocols and troubleshooting.

As long as you don't start out with:

If a packet hits a pocket on a socket on a port ...

Actually, I'm not sure that packet-level stuff is all that important.
Maybe I'm wrong. The thing I always find myself having to look up all
the time is stuff like using a netmask. So many utilities these days,
like ntp, use masks as part of their configuration. iptables too. I just
recently was looking at something that used a notation like
12.33.56.102/64 to specify, I don't remember if that was meant as a
subnet, or some other type of masking, or what. Half the time, the way
some of those folks write their docs, it comes out in my head as
backwards of what I think their intent must be, in whatever context it
is. In some ways, DECNet was easier. I think an initial talk on the
practical aspects would be the best place to start, with a followup
going into more gory details. IOW, being able to read my routing table
should be possible without knowing the details of packets, and is more
useful.

I see the KISS session is still TBA. I'd mentioned to Lynn that I could
do a talk on weblogging. It'd be centered on phpweblog, cuz that's what
I'm running. I don't have anything ready to go though, so a little
forewarning would be nice.

jed
-- 
We're frogs who are getting boiled in a pot full of single-character
morphemes, and we don't notice. - Larry Wall; Perl6, Apocalypse 5
_______________________________________________
CLUE-Tech mailing list
CLUE-Tech at clue.denver.co.us
http://clue.denver.co.us/mailman/listinfo/clue-tech