Gentoo patches [was Re: [CLUE-Tech] Escape from RH 8.0]
Ed Hill
ed at eh3.com
Sun Mar 2 22:33:06 MST 2003
On Sun, 2003-03-02 at 21:59, Adam Bultman wrote:
> >
> > > Since you bring it up, suppose I have a patch that gentoo doesn't. How
> > > hard is it to get a patched version of the package installed?
> > >
>
> Not to perpetuate the could-be war here, but Gentoo's portage system does
> have a few bugs in it. I can't currently emerge cups, as it's busted.
> There's a few other things that are broken, but man. I like it *so* much
> better than debian. Whoo! I have debian at work (and my gentoo
> workstation replaced my debian workstation) and it's a lot better. I
> adore the portage system. I run gentoo on my web/mail/db server ath ome,
> and it's been wonderful. It's nice. I almost prefer it over slackware
> (which is my all time fav so far).x
Ok, I'm not trying to turn this into a flame war but heres a *practical*
question: if you are given a closed-source binary-only set of RPMs with
non-trivial dependencies (eg. NI's LabVIEW), how would you go about
installing it on gentoo? Have any of you solved this problem?
This is not a made-up or theoretical example. I use LabVIEW on Linux on
an almost daily basis and they ship it as a bunch of RPMs. I'd like to
try other distros but it seems like a lot of effort only to wind up with
a system that will be difficult (?) to use in conjunction with our
commercial apps.
Ed
--
Edward H. Hill III, PhD
Post-Doctoral Researcher | Email: ed at eh3.com, ehill at mines.edu
Division of ESE | URLs: http://www.eh3.com
Colorado School of Mines | http://cesep.mines.edu/people/hill.htm
Golden, CO 80401 | Phones: 303-384-2094, 303-273-3483
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://cluedenver.org/pipermail/clue-tech/attachments/20030302/04d4576b/attachment.bin
More information about the clue-tech
mailing list