[CLUE-Tech] mailman spam

[David L. Willson]

My vote is that it's irrelevant, because by the time you reply to the
repugnant slime that sent you the message, the reply-to address is no
longer manned, if it ever was.

I vote for discard, simply because it's less effort.  I find that when I
'reject' I feel bound to write the scum-ball a nasty-gram.  'Total waste
of time...

-----Original Message-----
From: clue-tech-admin at clue.denver.co.us
[mailto:clue-tech-admin at clue.denver.co.us] On Behalf Of Jeff Cann
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 3:13 PM
To: clue-tech at clue.denver.co.us
Subject: [CLUE-Tech] mailman spam


Is it better to discard or reject mailman spam (i.e., list postings from

non-members)?

I have been discarding, under the assumption that a reject will bounce
the 
message back to the spammer.  I'm not sure if this is a good idea or
not.

I appreciate suggestions.
Jeff
_______________________________________________
CLUE-Tech mailing list
Post messages to: CLUE-Tech at clue.denver.co.us
Unsubscribe or manage your options:
http://clue.denver.co.us/mailman/listinfo/clue-tech