[clue-tech] nfs frustrations
Michael J. Hammel
mjhammel at graphics-muse.org
Wed Jun 3 15:45:23 MDT 2009
On Wed, 2009-06-03 at 17:22 -0400, Angelo Bertolli wrote:
> 1) There doesn't seem to be any way to get the system to automatically
> unmount a filesystem that is not responding
I think this depends on how you mount it, but typically the NFS server
needs to respond to the unmount request. If it aint there, it can't
respond. I use NFS at home between a bunch of boxes and end up having
to reboot the bad server to get things working again.
> 2) There doesn't seem to be any way to tell NFS to fail within 1
> minute. I know the maximum retrans timeout is supposed to be 60
> seconds, but after tweaking it
>
> When a mount is unavailable (I'm using ls to test) ...
> - soft/hard doesn't seem to make any difference (I'm using ro,noexec)
> - retrans, timeo, retry don't seem to make any difference no matter
I think you have to use the intr option to be able to unmount if there
is no response, possibly in conjunction with hard?
> what settings I use
> - I've tried at least 10 combinations of the above, and ls returns
> with an IO error within 3 - 5 minutes every time.
Intr should allow immediate return, I think.
> Oh well. We're using nfs3. Should I expect different behavior from nfs4 ?
Unknown. I haven't examined the functional differences between the two.
--
Michael J. Hammel <mjhammel at graphics-muse.org>
More information about the clue-tech
mailing list