[clue-tech] Application support / further development
David L. Willson
DLWillson at TheGeek.NU
Wed Sep 29 16:10:04 MDT 2010
I'll be the 4th on the "willing to change" list, Dave, Collins, and Mike.
My opinion is that CLUE (all lists) don't generate enough traffic for me to notice, much less get annoyed about, even at their heaviest. I think it's vain and counter-productive to sub-divide this rivulet of email traffic. To me, the simplicity of fewer lists is a feature worth the cost of getting a few messages that I don't care about. I care about the CLUEbies behind the messages and that's enough, for me.
David L. Willson
Trainer, Engineer, Enthusiast
MCT MSCE Network+ A+ Linux+ LPIC-1 NovellCLA UbuntuCP
tel://720.333.LANS
Freeing people from the tyranny (or whatevery) of Microsofty-ness
----- "David L. Anselmi" <anselmi at anselmi.us> wrote:
> Collins Richey wrote:
> > You will only aggravate the long term purists who shudder when
> > something goes to the "wrong" list. I'm in agreement with you -
> linux
> > related job offers should be perfectly fine on this list instead of
> > being shunted off to a list/service that many of you have never
> heard
> > of.
>
> Feel free to form a consensus for a new list policy and document that
> on the list info page.
>
> Dave
> _______________________________________________
> clue-tech mailing list
> clue-tech at cluedenver.org
> http://cluedenver.org/mailman/listinfo/clue-tech
More information about the clue-tech
mailing list