On Tue, 4 Jan 2005 16:03:21 -0700, Collins Richey <crichey at gmail.com> wrote: > > Absence of negatives is what I found. scponly appears to be popular, > but I haven't been able to get ahold of the 4.0 version, so I can't > say whether that's any better. > Ahh, the scponly website is up again, so I'll check it out. -- Collins