[clue-admin] Email Lists Referendum

[Philipp Giddings]

I vote for one all inclusive list.
I am an expert deleter.
Philipp

On 12/21/2010 8:25 PM, David L. Anselmi wrote:
> Greg Knaddison wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 6:48 PM, David L. Anselmi<anselmi at anselmi.us>   wrote:
>>> Some people think it's hard to get the word out to the group because we don't have a list with
>>> everyone on it.  I agree with that.  I can imagine other ways to address it besides one list but no
>>> one is currently working on other ways that I know of.
>>>  From the claim "it's hard to get the word out" I'll abstract to the
>> normative statement "people aren't responding the way we want."
> That's not what I said, nor what I meant.  I want everyone to know about installfest, and about the
> meeting that happened after Thanksgiving.  I don't want to receive 7 copies of my post.
>
> For installfest I use -announce and those not subscribed lose.  I don't worry about it but I wish it
> were different.
>
> For the meeting notes I used -admin, with an announcement on -announce.  Apologies to those who
> missed both.
>
> Neither case has anything to do with response.
>
>> Now some positive statements:
>> * Create a moderated mailing list that includes all members, but without deleting the current
>> mailing lists.
> If you do that I'll use it.  You might announce its availability and suggest why it is a better
> alternative to the others offered.  Then those voting can vote accordingly.  No one has suggested
> you can't campaign for your candidate.
>
> Dave
> _______________________________________________
> clue-admin mailing list
> clue-admin at cluedenver.org
> http://cluedenver.org/mailman/listinfo/clue-admin
>