[CLUE-Talk] Is this our own Kevin Cullis?

[Kevin Cullis]

Jeremiah Stanley wrote:
> 
> > > http://www.linux.com/news/articles.phtml?sid=93&aid=11292
> > > I just wanted to know who the responsible party was on this? ;)
> 
> > Yes, the very same.  However, the graphics didn't come through yet it
> > would seem. :-(  The idea of the article is to get people talking about
> > the issue and inform those of these concepts who are not aware of them.
> > As a Quality professional, I am ALWAYS open for comments!!
> 
> Well seeing that you have already been flamed by an anonymous troll I
> would like to say that I liked the article. Seeing that type of article on
> a linux site (esp. Linux.com) is productive as I have see one too many
> 'let us all lynch M$ for one of their many oversights' articles on that
> website. I really appreciated the glossary at the end defining you terms.

Feedback is ALWAYS welcome, not matter how crude, rude, or nice. The
Editor stated to me that this article is definitly needed in the
community, but how many will heed the call. I'm expected that this issue
will drop because of little interest just as it has in the real world. 
But, then again, Linux has proven that competition is good for M$ and
they can't rest now!

> 
> Do you have a mirror of this somewhere? I would like to use it the next
> time I have to prove that the obvious is not always the best way of doing
> things.
> 

I'm not aware of any mirrors yet, so I'll have to wait and see.  Very
true about the obvious.

Kevin