[CLUE-Talk] Tolkien and allegory
Jeff Cann
j.cann at isuma.org
Mon Jan 12 15:39:24 MST 2004
On Monday 12 January 2004 6:53 am, Dennis J Perkins wrote:
> I see no need to return to the trivium and quadrivium. They were for a
> simpler time.
You are incorrect on this notion -- grammar, logic, and rhetoric are still
fundamental to becoming educated. How can I learn to read and write w/o
grammar? How can I learn mathematics (esp higher math) w/o logic? How can I
express myself coherently in writing and speech w/o rhetoric?
> I would like to see them teach advanced subjects earlier.
How would you propose something like this without first teaching logic?
> Not all students are capable of algebra or calculus, but teach it to those
> who can learn it.
I'll be sure to withhold my vote for you for school board -- pigenholing
doesn't seem to accomplish much, does it?
There are numerous examples where 'underprivileged' high schoolers are taught
algebra and calculus so much that they pass the AP Calc exams.
I agreed with most of the rest of your post, but it seems like you are basing
much of your opinion on second-hand information. More facts might help you
understand some of the problems with our educational system.
Later,
Jeff
--
http://isuma.org/
More information about the clue-talk
mailing list