[clue-talk] Whiny Bitches

[Angelo Bertolli]

David Rudder wrote:
> So, it is safe to assume that Hillary Clinton will usher in a new age of
> dropping abortion rates.
>
> So, why aren't you campaigning for Hillary?  You want to reduce
> abortions, right?  A Clinton in the White House is the only proven way
> of reducing abortions.  Or are you one of those who are always
> complaining, but won't take the obvious path to solving the problem?
>   

What amazes me is that religious pro-life movement doesn't see abortion 
as so extremely bad that they'd be willing to let someone use condoms.  
Using a condom has to be 1,000,000 times less sinful than an abortion.  
So my point is, the real problem with pro-life groups is that they're 
more focused on their religious agenda than their pro-life agenda.  A 
group really focused on the abortion issue itself wouldn't have all 
these trappings (abstinence, human at conception, etc.) because they'd 
really be concerned about the PEOPLE being KILLED instead of their own 
overall ideal world.

I'd prefer a candidate who is anti-abortion but simply for the reason of 
logic that it's wrong to kill people.  People in office really shouldn't 
let their religious beliefs dictate policy.  This may mean that both 
sides have to give up "control" over the issue let the scientific and 
medical community say when something is human, and stop leaving it up to 
politics.

Angelo