[CLUE-Tech] Debian: gpm not installing by default
jbrockmeier at earthlink.net
jbrockmeier at earthlink.net
Sun Apr 21 11:03:10 MDT 2002
On Sun, 21 Apr 2002, Collins wrote:
*snip*
> There's a lot of discussion on the user group about how best to fix
> the problem permanently. Quite a few people are recommending tagging
> the fixes as stable (3 months behind current), current, and
> experimental.
The Debian system - though very slow - works pretty well. By the
time something hits stable it has been banged on HARD and it's
stable.
Having stable/testing/unstable is a good start. The Debian maintainer
process is also pretty effective - though it's a bit off-putting
in its formality. It's also a bit single-minded. It's designed for
developers, by developers. If you just want to maintain, say, documentation,
it's not well-designed for that.
> If you install a system from scratch, you won't encounter any of these
> problems, and your system will be rock solid. The KDE 3.0 package,
> for example, was perfect if you hadn't tinkered with the Beta
> releases.
Hmmm. In that case, I'll have to give it a shot. I've installed the
precompiled binaries for Mandrake and Slackware - both are horrible.
(Note, I don't think the Slackware or Mandrake packages are "official")
> I've really only encountered two major problems in two years. One was
> about 8-9 months ago when a major revision to the boot scripts
> occurred. I did a reinstall to cure that. About a month ago, a
> binary incompatible but source compatible update to libpng was
> released without any warning. This broke and required recompile of
> most X-based stuff (kde, gnome, xfce, etc.).
Urgh. That would hurt.
> Once again, you would never encounter this type of problem when
> installing from scratch.
So, compile everything and you'll be okay? Well, I've got a
PII 350/128MB of RAM with nothing better to do...
I wonder if there's a way to use a more powerful machine to compile
packages and then move them to another? I've got a Dual Xeon III
with 1GB of RAM running KRUD that would make short order of compiling
everything...probably too complex to get it to work right, though.
> Except for the occasional update snafu, gentoo is the most rock solid
> distro that I've used. You just need to stay a little behind the
> times with updates. There are plenty of bleeding edge afficionados
> who will try it out and report what's broken.
Cool.
> The other side of the coin is this. Like every linux distro,
> installing on a laptop or on unusual new peripherals (RAID, etc.) can
> be problematic. Also, gentoo requires you to download lots of source
> packages. If you have only a 56K modem, this will be a trying time.
> My cable router/modem works OK, but some people have had difficulty
> with getting some of the more unusual DSL setups to play nicely.
>
> I'm onboard for the duration, but YMMV.
Thanks for the info. I will check it out.
Best,
Zonker
--
Joe 'Zonker' Brockmeier -=- jbrockmeier at earthlink.net
http://www.DissociatedPress.net/
ymessenger: jbrockmeier / AIM: ZonkerJoe
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
"A common mistake that people make when trying to design something
completely foolproof was to underestimate the ingenuity of complete
fools." -- Douglas Adams
More information about the clue-tech
mailing list