[CLUE-Tech] If you administer a mail server, you might find this useful.

[David Anselmi]

William wrote:
[...]
> What's important is that it offers a stronger anti-UCE stance than
> most other solutions, including automated null-routing of repeat
> offenders.  Even if you don't need the POP before SMTP authentication
> mechanism (easily disabled), you should find this useful.

So your tool provides authorization for smtp relaying.  That seems 
different from blocking incoming spam to your addresses.  But I'm not 
sure I'm clear which problem you're addressing.  Both?  The mechanisms 
seem different enough that they should be different packages.

I guess you might consider summarizing your service categories at the 
top of your web page.  And perhaps outlining how your tool is a better 
approach than the others out there.

And using IMAP avoids the POP before SMTP problem by sending mail over 
an authenticated channel (rather than just receiving it), doesn't it?

Thanks!
Dave