[clue-tech] Samba problamba

[mike havlicek]

Hi Dave,

You mention that you are seeing behavior that you recall from having
Samba 2.x in place. Are you sure that your restore didn't mix any
chocolate and peanut butter? This is a shot in the dark question
to make sure you that you are not dealing with some mutant
hybrid system :) I remember being on a similar list years ago when
it was finally discovered that a man was seeking help with what became 
coined a SlackHatRedWare system:) In general, Things like ldd or reverse package lookups on the subsystem components might help determine this
(or time stamps ...?) Do you have a means of confirming restore integrity?

-Mike

--- On Fri, 9/17/10, David L. Willson <DLWillson at TheGeek.NU> wrote:

> From: David L. Willson <DLWillson at TheGeek.NU>
> Subject: Re: [clue-tech] Samba problamba
> To: "CLUE technical discussion" <clue-tech at cluedenver.org>
> Date: Friday, September 17, 2010, 11:02 AM
> Mike and Dave,
> 
> I have RTFM'd a lot. I'm sorry for my poor question.
> 
> Here is a high-level overview:
> 
> I have a Samba 3.x on Ubuntu server that has been working
> great for a few years.
> 
> I'm using a Samba user-map to map several domain accounts
> to one Unix account.
> 
> The system had a disk failure, and I had to do some work to
> recover, but I don't remember changing the Samba config
> around the time of the break. Nonetheless, it doesn't work
> now.
> 
> As of the break, none of the domain accounts work, but the
> Unix account credentials work to login to Samba. I think I
> remember things working this way in Samba 2.x with "security
> = user" and "encrypt passwords = no".
> 
> I've played with the user-map and the config file until I'm
> blue. I can't figure out why it cut to this behavior.
> 
> A few years ago, I had an update take Samba out entirely,
> but a subsequent update the next day fixed it right up. This
> break has been in for over a week, and I've checked for
> newer updates several times.
> 
> I feel like a waterbed. (I'm baffled.)
> 
> David L. Willson
> Trainer, Engineer, Enthusiast
> MCT MSCE Network+ A+ Linux+ LPIC-1 NovellCLA UbuntuCP
> tel://720.333.LANS
> Freeing people from the tyranny (or whatevery) of
> Microsofty-ness
> 
> ----- "mike havlicek" <mhavlicek1 at yahoo.com>
> wrote:
> 
> > David,
> > 
> > It might help if you give an abstract overview of what
> it is you
> > are trying to accomplish. Just posting a snippet of a
> config with
> > what seems to be a vague why doesn't this work the way
> I want it to
> > without saying what you are trying to do isn't very
> appealing to 
> > troubleshoot. I admit this description from my end is
> hasty and
> > perhaps hypocritical ... perhaps what appeared to be a
> config snippet
> > actually did have all the necessary information?
> > 
> > -Mike
> > 
> > --- On Thu, 9/16/10, David L. Willson <DLWillson at TheGeek.NU>
> wrote:
> > 
> > > From: David L. Willson <DLWillson at TheGeek.NU>
> > > Subject: Re: [clue-tech] Samba problamba
> > > To: "CLUE technical discussion" <clue-tech at cluedenver.org>
> > > Date: Thursday, September 16, 2010, 9:51 PM
> > > > David L. Willson wrote:
> > > > > Can anyone spot the error in the config
> that is
> > > causing this
> > > > frickin' server to think ~it~
> > > > > should  do the domain authentication?
> > > > 
> > > > Sure.
> > > > 
> > > > > security = domain
> > > > 
> > > > You want security = server.
> > > > 
> > > >
> > http://www.samba.org/samba/docs/man/Samba-HOWTO-Collection/ServerType.html#id2560758
> > > > 
> > > > Dave
> > > 
> > > But... As I read that article, "security =
> domain" is
> > > better than "security = server".
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > clue-tech mailing list
> > > clue-tech at cluedenver.org
> > > http://cluedenver.org/mailman/listinfo/clue-tech
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> >       
> > _______________________________________________
> > clue-tech mailing list
> > clue-tech at cluedenver.org
> > http://cluedenver.org/mailman/listinfo/clue-tech
> _______________________________________________
> clue-tech mailing list
> clue-tech at cluedenver.org
> http://cluedenver.org/mailman/listinfo/clue-tech